Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 274
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Cust. Ct. 163 →
United States Customs Court·Decided January 27, 1955·No. No. 58734; protests 232869-K and 235296-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed (Lotus corniculatus) similar in all material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 274 (cusc 1955).
34 Cust. Ct. 274 (Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 163 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)