Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
30 Cust. Ct. 395, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 233
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Cust. Ct. 163 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 25, 1953·No. No. 57203; protests 196497-K and 198032-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed (Lotus corniculatus) similar in all material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 395, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 233 (cusc 1953).
30 Cust. Ct. 395 (Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 163 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)