Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 352
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 3, 1957
DocketNo. 61014; protest 268011-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 352 (Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 352 (cusc 1957).

Opinions

Richardson, Judge:

By this suit, plaintiffs claim that merchandise assessed at 2 cents per pound under the provision in paragraph 763, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, for clover, not specially provided for, should be dutiable at 1 cent per pound under the provision in said paragraph, as modified, supra, for forage crop seeds, not specially provided for.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed (lotus corniculatus) similar in all material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462, and under authority of the decision cited, we sustain the claim of the plaintiffs that the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “A” and checked with the initials JH by Examiner James Halligan, which was assessed with duty at 2 cents per pound under paragraph 763, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as clover seed, not specially provided for, is properly dutiable at 1 cent per pound under the same paragraph, as modified, supra, as a forage crop seed, not specially provided for.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 163 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 359 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/transcontinental-seed-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1957.