Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 359
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1955
DocketNo. 59603; protest 257007-K (New York)
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 359 (Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 359 (cusc 1955).
Opinions
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed similar in all material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 352 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)
Stanford Seed Co. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 548 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)
Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 543 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 Cust. Ct. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-dickinson-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.