Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 543
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 13, 1957
DocketNo. 60877; protest 28623A-K (A) (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 543 (Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 543 (cusc 1957).

Opinions

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed similar in all material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 163 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 359 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Cust. Ct. 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-dickinson-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.