Towsley v. Stanzak

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Towsley v. Stanzak. Read the opinion of the Court — 410 Mont. 403
Montana Supreme Court·Decided June 8, 2022·No. DA 21-0514·Unpublished

Opinion

06/08/2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 21-0514

DA 21-0514

JIM L. TOWSLEY and BETTY SMITH TOWSLEY,

Plaintiffs and Appellees, v.

DAVID P. STANZAK, MARGO L. STANZAK, CRAIG FITCH, CARYN MISKE, LAURENCE B, MILLER, JR., STEPHEN M. ZANDI, KARIN M. ZANDI, and all persons, known or unknown, ORDER claiming or who might claim any right, title, interest in or lien or encumbrance upon the personal property described in the Complaint below which is adverse to the Plaintiff's ownership or a cloud upon Plaintiff's title thereto, whether such a claim or possible claim may be present or contingent,

Defendants and Appellants.

Appellants, by counsel, have filed a motion for extension of time to file their reply brief. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellants have until June 24, 2022, to file their reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court June 8 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Towsley v. Stanzak, (Mo. 2022).

Towsley v. Stanzak (Towsley v. Stanzak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.