Towsley v. Stanzak

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Towsley v. Stanzak. Read the opinion of the Court — 410 Mont. 403
Montana Supreme Court·Decided December 22, 2021·No. DA 21-0514·Unpublished

Opinion

12/22/2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 21-0514

DA 21-0514

JIM L. TOWSLEY and BETTY SMITH TOWSLEY,

Plaintiffs and Appellees, v.

DAVID P. STANZAK, MARGO L. STANZAK, CRAIG FITCH, CARYN MISKE, LAURENCE B, MILLER, JR., STEPHEN M. ZANDI, KARIN M. ZANDI, and all persons, known or unknown, ORDER

claiming or who might claim any right, title, interest in or lien or encumbrance upon the personal property described in the Complaint below which is adverse to the Plaintiff's ownership or a cloud upon Plaintiff's title thereto, whether such a claim or possible claim may be present or contingent,

Defendants and Appellants.

Upon consideration of Appellees’ motion to substitute the appellee in this matter, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to substitute Appellee is GRANTED, and this cause shall be captioned as above.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court December 22 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Towsley v. Stanzak, (Mo. 2021).

Towsley v. Stanzak (Towsley v. Stanzak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.