Towsley v. Stanzak

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Towsley v. Stanzak. Read the opinion of the Court — 410 Mont. 403
Montana Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 2022·No. DA 21-0514·Unpublished

Opinion

04/18/2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 21-0514 Supreme Court Case No. DA 21-0514

JIM L. TOWSLEY AND BETTY SMITH TOWSLEY, Plaintiffs and Appellees, vs.

DAVID P. STANZAK, MARGO L. STANZAK, CRAIG FITCH, CARYN MISKE, LAURENCE B. MILLER, JR., STEPHEN M. ZANDI, KARIN M. ZANDI, and all persons, known or unknown, claiming or who might claim any right, title, interest in or lien or encumbrance upon the personal property described in the Complaint below which is adverse to the Plaintiff's ownership or a cloud upon Plaintiff's title thereto, whether such a claim or possible claim may be present or contingent, Defendants and Appellees.

ODER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

On Appeal from the Montana Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, Cause No. DV-20-18, the Honorable Jason Marks presiding.

The Appellees’ Unopposed Motion for Extension (Second Request) under

Montana Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(2) is granted. Appellees’ response brief

shall be due May 27, 2022.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court April 18 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Towsley v. Stanzak, (Mo. 2022).

Towsley v. Stanzak (Towsley v. Stanzak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.