TOWN OF LONE OAK v. VP CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 16, 2025
DocketA25A1762
StatusPublished

This text of TOWN OF LONE OAK v. VP CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC (TOWN OF LONE OAK v. VP CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TOWN OF LONE OAK v. VP CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 16, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A1762. TOWN OF LONE OAK et al. v. VP CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC.

In this civil action, several defendants filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order granting the plaintiff’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement and denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss. We lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below.” An order granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement “is not final until the trial court expressly enters final judgment on that order.” Thomas v. Sheppard, 349 Ga. App. 871, 871 (827 SE2d 60) (2019) (citation and punctuation omitted); see also Torres v. Elkin, 317 Ga. App. 135, 139 (1) (730 SE2d 518) (2012) (“[N]otwithstanding the trial court’s grant of a motion to enforce a settlement, a case is not at an end until such time as the agreement has been made the judgment of the court, thereby terminating the litigation.”) (citation and punctuation omitted); accord Underwood v. Underwood, 282 Ga. 643, 644 (1) (651 SE2d 736) (2007). Here, the record contains no indication that the trial court has entered a final judgment and made the settlement agreement the judgment of the court. And the denial of the defendants’ motion to dismiss similarly did not conclude the trial court proceedings. Consequently, because no final judgment has been entered, the defendants were required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures — including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court — to appeal the order at issue here. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989). Their failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/16/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Bailey
471 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Thomas v. Sheppard.
827 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019)
Underwood v. Underwood
651 S.E.2d 736 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)
Boyd v. State
383 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Torres v. Elkin
730 S.E.2d 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
TOWN OF LONE OAK v. VP CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-lone-oak-v-vp-capital-partners-llc-gactapp-2025.