Boyd v. State
This text of 383 S.E.2d 906 (Boyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was charged, via accusation, with abandoning his two minor children, OCGA § 19-10-1. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the accusation, asserting the general grounds. The trial court denied the motion to dismiss and this direct appeal followed. Held:
The overruling of defendant’s motion to dismiss the accusation, which leaves the case pending for trial, is not a final judgment from which appeal can be taken, absent a certificate of immediate review. OCGA § 5-6-34; Partain v. State, 138 Ga. App. 171, 172 (225 SE2d 736). Consequently, since defendant has not complied with the interlocutory appeal procedure prescribed by OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), this appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
383 S.E.2d 906, 191 Ga. App. 435, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-state-gactapp-1989.