In Re: Akins Doherty

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 24, 2024
DocketA24D0304
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Akins Doherty (In Re: Akins Doherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Akins Doherty, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 24, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24D0304. IN RE: AKINS DOHERTY.

In this civil action, the trial court entered an order requiring the parties’ attorneys to pay the clerk of court $1,230 each to cover the costs associated with mustering a jury panel when their case did not go forward on the day scheduled for trial. Plaintiff’s counsel Akins Doherty then filed this application for discretionary review of the court’s order. We lack jurisdiction. Based on the limited application materials, it appears that this civil action remains pending in the trial court. As a result, Doherty was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures — including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court — to appeal the order at issue here. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989). Pretermitting whether the trial court’s order otherwise would be subject to the discretionary appeal statute, see OCGA § 5-6-35, Doherty’s failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal requirements deprives us of jurisdiction over this application, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/24/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Bailey
471 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Boyd v. State
383 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Akins Doherty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-akins-doherty-gactapp-2024.