Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co. v. Torralbas

176 So. 3d 374, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14885, 2015 WL 5834247
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 2015·No. No. 3D15-1740·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

LOGUE, J.

Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company appeals an order determining Alfredo Tor-ralbas’ entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs. An order that merely determines entitlement to attorney’s fees without actually awarding an amount of fees is not final and, therefore, not appealable. Reid v. Estate of Sonder, 63 So.3d 7, 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“It is well established that an order granting entitlement to fees is a non-final, non-appealable order until the amount of the fee is set.”). While the order under appeal determines Torralbas’ entitlement, it does not set the amount of the fees and costs. This Court therefore [375]*375lacks appellate jurisdiction to review the order.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co. v. Torralbas, 176 So. 3d 374, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14885, 2015 WL 5834247 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

176 So. 3d 374 (Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co. v. Torralbas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Local Door Coupons Franchise v. Mayers
261 So. 3d 726 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Atkin v. Kane
246 So. 3d 574 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016
Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc.
196 So. 3d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)