Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II
This text of Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II (Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 15, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D15-1450 Lower Tribunal No. 13-10961 ________________
Melinda Selyem, Appellant,
vs.
Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc., a Florida corporation; and Ana C. Miguez, and Nathalie A. Hernandez, individually, Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.
Remer & Georges-Pierre, Anthony M. Georges-Pierre and Peter M. Hoogerwoerd, for appellant.
Law Offices of Isaac Benmergui, and Lauren Luck, for appellees.
Before WELLS, SALTER and SCALES, JJ.
WELLS, Judge. We affirm the order dismissing Melinda Selyem’s complaint with prejudice,
but dismiss Selyem’s appeal of the order granting entitlement to attorney’s fees as
premature. See Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co. v. Torralbas, 176 So. 3d 374 (Fla. 3d
DCA 2015) (“An order that merely determines entitlement to attorney’s fees
without actually awarding an amount of fees is not final and, therefore, not
appealable.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selyem-v-nathalies-hair-color-studio-ii-fladistctapp-2016.