Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 2016·No. 15-1450·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 15, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-1450 Lower Tribunal No. 13-10961 ________________

Melinda Selyem, Appellant,

vs.

Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc., a Florida corporation; and Ana C. Miguez, and Nathalie A. Hernandez, individually, Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.

Remer & Georges-Pierre, Anthony M. Georges-Pierre and Peter M. Hoogerwoerd, for appellant.

Law Offices of Isaac Benmergui, and Lauren Luck, for appellees.

Before WELLS, SALTER and SCALES, JJ.

WELLS, Judge. We affirm the order dismissing Melinda Selyem’s complaint with prejudice,

but dismiss Selyem’s appeal of the order granting entitlement to attorney’s fees as

premature. See Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co. v. Torralbas, 176 So. 3d 374 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2015) (“An order that merely determines entitlement to attorney’s fees

without actually awarding an amount of fees is not final and, therefore, not

appealable.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II (Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co. v. Torralbas
176 So. 3d 374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)