Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc.

196 So. 3d 447, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9235, 2016 WL 3268729

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 15, 2016

DocketNo. 3D15-1450

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 3d 447 (Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc., 196 So. 3d 447, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9235, 2016 WL 3268729 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

We affirm the order dismissing Melinda Selyem’s complaint with prejudice, but dismiss Selyem’s appeal of the order granting entitlement to attorney’s fees as premature. See Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co. v. Torralbas, 176 So.3d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“An order that merely determines entitlement to attorney’s fees without actually awarding.an amount of fees is not final and, therefore, not appealable.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WELLS, Judge.

We affirm the order dismissing Melinda Selyem’s complaint with prejudice, but dismiss Selyem’s appeal of the order granting entitlement to attorney’s fees as premature. See Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co. v. Torralbas, 176 So.3d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“An order that merely determines entitlement to attorney’s fees without actually awarding.an amount of fees is not final and, therefore, not appealable.”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 So. 3d 447, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9235, 2016 WL 3268729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selyem-v-nathalies-hair-color-studio-ii-inc-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack