Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc.
196 So. 3d 447, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9235, 2016 WL 3268729
Opinion
We affirm the order dismissing Melinda Selyem’s complaint with prejudice, but dismiss Selyem’s appeal of the order granting entitlement to attorney’s fees as premature. See Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co. v. Torralbas, 176 So.3d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“An order that merely determines entitlement to attorney’s fees without actually awarding.an amount of fees is not final and, therefore, not appealable.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc., 196 So. 3d 447, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9235, 2016 WL 3268729 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
196 So. 3d 447 (Selyem v. Nathalie's Hair & Color Studio II, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co. v. Torralbas
176 So. 3d 374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)