Torres v. State
830 So. 2d 917, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17145, 2002 WL 31557956
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 2002·No. No. 4D02-2337·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant appeals an order denying her rule 3.800(a) motion. The trial court did not attach those parts of the record in the case that refute the defendant’s claim. See Ford v. State, 667 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The state concedes that such attachments should have been made. We reverse and remand for the trial court to attach the portions of the record refuting the claim pursuant to our ruling in Ford.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Torres v. State, 830 So. 2d 917, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17145, 2002 WL 31557956 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
830 So. 2d 917 (Torres v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martone v. State
922 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)