Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Torres v. State

Torres v. State

802 So. 2d 1199, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 2002 WL 10520
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Torres v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 808 So. 2d 234 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 2002·No. No. 1D01-2406·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in determining that Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion was time [1200]*1200barred. Because the claims appear to be facially sufficient and are not conclusively refuted by the record, we REVERSE the trial court’s order and REMAND for an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALLEN, C.J., and BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Torres v. State, 802 So. 2d 1199, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 2002 WL 10520 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

802 So. 2d 1199 (Torres v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.