Torres v. State
802 So. 2d 1199, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 2002 WL 10520
This text of 802 So. 2d 1199 (Torres v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Torres v. State, 802 So. 2d 1199, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 2002 WL 10520 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
The trial court erred in determining that Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion was time [1200]*1200barred. Because the claims appear to be facially sufficient and are not conclusively refuted by the record, we REVERSE the trial court’s order and REMAND for an evidentiary hearing.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 1199, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 2002 WL 10520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.