Tolar v. State

260 S.W. 1043, 97 Tex. Crim. 145, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 232
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 26, 1924·No. No. 8185.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor with punishment of one year in the penitentiary.

Appellant seeks enlargement from custody pending appeal upon a bond purported to have been executed in conformity to Article 904 or our C. C. P. The bond is approved by the sheriff only. It *146 fails to also have the approval of the trial judge. In this respect it is defective, and no jurisdiction was conferred upon this court by-reason thereof. See Article 904 C. C. P., Chumley v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 54, 201 S. W., 176; King v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 304, 203 S. W., 52; Johnson v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 376, 203 S. W., 903; Gray v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 1, 224 S. W., 513.

For the defect in the bond heretofore pointed out this appeal must be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tolar v. State, 260 S.W. 1043, 97 Tex. Crim. 145, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 232 (Tex. 1924).

260 S.W. 1043 (Tolar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballard v. State
124 S.W.2d 131 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Faupel v. State
68 S.W.2d 1113 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Reeves v. State
47 S.W.2d 309 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Willmott v. State
20 S.W.2d 787 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Lloyd v. State
279 S.W. 843 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)