Johnson v. State

203 S.W. 903, 83 Tex. Crim. 376, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 8, 1918·No. No. 4903.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The Assistant Attorney General makes a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of a sufficient appeal bond. There is an appeal bond in the record, but it is only approved *377 by the sheriff. • The statute requires that the trial judge shall also approve it. For this reason the appeal will not be entertained. The questions raised by the record and insisted upon for reversal will noj be discussed on account of the dismissel.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 203 S.W. 903, 83 Tex. Crim. 376, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196 (Tex. 1918).

203 S.W. 903 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clinton Vernon Williams v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999
Lamb v. State
108 S.W.2d 1112 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Jones v. State
267 S.W. 985 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Tolar v. State
260 S.W. 1043 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Golle v. State
93 Tex. Crim. 233 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)