Lamb v. State
This text of 108 S.W.2d 1112 (Lamb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of property over the value of fifty dollars, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.
The record before us shows that the term of court at which appellant was tried began on the 19th day of October, 1936, and adjourned for the term on the 21st day of November, 1936. Appellant as principal, together with his sureties, made and entered into an appeal bond in the sum of $1,000.00 which was approved by the sheriff alone on the 30th day of December, 1936. It fails to have the approval of the trial judge as required by art. 818, C. C. P., 1925. In this respect the bond is defective and does not confer jurisdiction on this court. See Tolar v. State, 97 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Jones v. State, 99 Tex.Crim. Rep.; King v. State,
By reason of the defective bond, the appeal must be dismissed and it is so ordered.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 S.W.2d 1112, 133 Tex. Crim. 97, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.