Chumley v. State

201 S.W. 176, 83 Tex. Crim. 54, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 1918·No. No. 4904.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for a felony, on the charge by indictment, for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor.

The Assistant Attorney General, on behalf of the- State, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency of the appeal bond. There is found in the record an appeal bond in the sum of $2000 which is approved by the sheriff. The statute, article 904, Code of Criminal Procedure, requires that the bond shall be given in an amount to be fixed by the court as well as the sheriff. It has been held that unless a bond shows the approval of the court it is insufficient and will necessitate a dismissal of the "appeal. Wells v. State, 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 277, 150 S. W. Rep., 1163; Black v. State, 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 151, 151 S. W. Rep., 1053.

In view of the record and the authorities the motion to dismiss is sustained.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chumley v. State, 201 S.W. 176, 83 Tex. Crim. 54, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77 (Tex. 1918).

201 S.W. 176 (Chumley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
267 S.W. 985 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Tolar v. State
260 S.W. 1043 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Golle v. State
93 Tex. Crim. 233 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)