Tobin v. Tobin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Tobin v. Tobin

32 Pa. Super. 186, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 10, 1906

DocketAppeal, No. 31

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 32 Pa. Super. 186 (Tobin v. Tobin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tobin v. Tobin, 32 Pa. Super. 186, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319 (Pa. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

This is an appeal from an order discharging a rule to show cause why service of the subpoena in divorce should not be set aside. Such order is clearly interlocutory, and not the subject of an independent appeal: Lycoming Fire Insurance Co. v. Storrs, 97 Pa. 354; Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. v. Snowdon, 161 Pa. 201; Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co., 191 Pa. 215. Therefore the motion to quash the appeal must be sustained.

Appeal quashed, the costs to be paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

This is an appeal from an order discharging a rule to show cause why service of the subpoena in divorce should not be set aside. Such order is clearly interlocutory, and not the subject of an independent appeal: Lycoming Fire Insurance Co. v. Storrs, 97 Pa. 354; Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. v. Snowdon, 161 Pa. 201; Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co., 191 Pa. 215. Therefore the motion to quash the appeal must be sustained.

Appeal quashed, the costs to be paid by the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Pa. Super. 186, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tobin-v-tobin-pasuperct-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack