Tobin v. Tobin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Tobin v. Tobin

32 Pa. Super. 186, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 10, 1906·No. Appeal, No. 31·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

This is an appeal from an order discharging a rule to show cause why service of the subpoena in divorce should not be set aside. Such order is clearly interlocutory, and not the subject of an independent appeal: Lycoming Fire Insurance Co. v. Storrs, 97 Pa. 354; Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. v. Snowdon, 161 Pa. 201; Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co., 191 Pa. 215. Therefore the motion to quash the appeal must be sustained.

Appeal quashed, the costs to be paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

This is an appeal from an order discharging a rule to show cause why service of the subpoena in divorce should not be set aside. Such order is clearly interlocutory, and not the subject of an independent appeal: Lycoming Fire Insurance Co. v. Storrs, 97 Pa. 354; Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. v. Snowdon, 161 Pa. 201; Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co., 191 Pa. 215. Therefore the motion to quash the appeal must be sustained.

Appeal quashed, the costs to be paid by the appellant.

Tobin v. Tobin, 32 Pa. Super. 186, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319 (Pa. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

32 Pa. Super. 186 (Tobin v. Tobin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related