Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co.

43 A. 207, 191 Pa. 215, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 805
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 24, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 402·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pm Curiam,

This appeal is from the decree of the court below discharging the defendant’s rule “ to show cause why the service of the bill of complaint in the above cause on John H. Klock,” etc., “ should not be set aside.”

The decree in question is clearly interlocutory, and no appeal lies therefrom to this or any other court at the present stage of the cause. The motion to quash must therefore be sustained.

Appeal quashed, at appellant’s costs, and record remitted with a procedendo.

[218]*21859

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co., 43 A. 207, 191 Pa. 215, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 805 (Pa. 1899).

43 A. 207 (Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Highland v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Co.
80 Pa. Super. 219 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.
118 A. 565 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Kuyalowicz v. Schuylkill Gas & Electric Co.
1 Pa. D. & C. 159 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1921)
Tobin v. Tobin
32 Pa. Super. 186 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Ben Franklin Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania Water Co.
25 Pa. Super. 628 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler Works
54 A. 334 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)