Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co.
This text of 43 A. 207 (Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from the decree of the court below discharging the defendant’s rule “ to show cause why the service of the bill of complaint in the above cause on John H. Klock,” etc., “ should not be set aside.”
The decree in question is clearly interlocutory, and no appeal lies therefrom to this or any other court at the present stage of the cause. The motion to quash must therefore be sustained.
Appeal quashed, at appellant’s costs, and record remitted with a procedendo.
[218]*21859
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 A. 207, 191 Pa. 215, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/platt-v-belsena-coal-mining-co-pa-1899.