Walsh v. Walsh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Walsh v. Walsh

61 Pa. Super. 620, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 383

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 20, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 244·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order refusing to dismiss the libel for want of jurisdiction. Our opinion is that- this was an interlocutory order from which an independent appeal does not lie. See Richardson v. Richardson, 193 Pa. 279; Tobin v. Tobin, 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 186. If the defendant does nothing in the meantime to remove his objection to the jurisdiction he will be entitled to raise it by appeal after final decree, [621] but the order cannot be made the subject of an independent appeal prior thereto. The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order refusing to dismiss the libel for want of jurisdiction. Our opinion is that- this was an interlocutory order from which an independent appeal does not lie. See Richardson v. Richardson, 193 Pa. 279; Tobin v. Tobin, 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 186. If the defendant does nothing in the meantime to remove his objection to the jurisdiction he will be entitled to raise it by appeal after final decree, [621] but the order cannot be made the subject of an independent appeal prior thereto. The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Walsh v. Walsh, 61 Pa. Super. 620, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 383 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

61 Pa. Super. 620 (Walsh v. Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related