Walsh v. Walsh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Walsh v. Walsh

61 Pa. Super. 620, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 383

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 20, 1915

DocketAppeal, No. 244

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 Pa. Super. 620 (Walsh v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walsh v. Walsh, 61 Pa. Super. 620, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 383 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order refusing to dismiss the libel for want of jurisdiction. Our opinion is that- this was an interlocutory order from which an independent appeal does not lie. See Richardson v. Richardson, 193 Pa. 279; Tobin v. Tobin, 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 186. If the defendant does nothing in the meantime to remove his objection to the jurisdiction he will be entitled to raise it by appeal after final decree, [621]*621but the order cannot be made the subject of an independent appeal prior thereto. The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order refusing to dismiss the libel for want of jurisdiction. Our opinion is that- this was an interlocutory order from which an independent appeal does not lie. See Richardson v. Richardson, 193 Pa. 279; Tobin v. Tobin, 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 186. If the defendant does nothing in the meantime to remove his objection to the jurisdiction he will be entitled to raise it by appeal after final decree, [621]*621but the order cannot be made the subject of an independent appeal prior thereto. The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Pa. Super. 620, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-walsh-pasuperct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack