Titus Jones v. Roselle Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Titus Jones v. Roselle Jones

DecidedOctober 14, 2019

DocketA20D0094

StatusPublished

This text of Titus Jones v. Roselle Jones (Titus Jones v. Roselle Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Titus Jones v. Roselle Jones, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 08, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0094. TITUS JONES et al. v. ROSELLE JONES et al.

Titus Jones, acting pro se, filed an “Application for Discretionary or Interlocutory Appeal” seeking review of the trial court’s order denying his motions to dismiss and to stay. The case was docket as a discretionary application because the filing contained no certificate of immediate review. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Because this action remains pending below, Jones was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court – to appeal the denial of his motions to dismiss and to stay. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989); Pace Constr. Corp. v. Northpark Assocs., 215 Ga. App. 438, 439 (450 SE2d 828) (1994) (denial of motion to dismiss is interlocutory); see also Grange Mut. Casualty Co. v. Riverdale Apartments, L. P., 218 Ga. App. 685, 687 (463 SE2d 46) (1995) (denial of motion to stay is interlocutory). Here, it appears that Jones attempted to obtain a certificate of immediate review, but the trial court declined to enter the certificate. “The denial of a certificate for interlocutory appeal is not reviewable.” Price v. State, 237 Ga. 352, 352 (2) (227 SE2d 368) (1976). Absent a timely certificate of immediate review, the party seeking to appeal must wait until the final judgment to do so. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175, 176 (200 SE2d 748) (1973). Jones’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/08/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 08, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0094. TITUS JONES et al. v. ROSELLE JONES et al.

Titus Jones, acting pro se, filed an “Application for Discretionary or Interlocutory Appeal” seeking review of the trial court’s order denying his motions to dismiss and to stay. The case was docket as a discretionary application because the filing contained no certificate of immediate review. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Because this action remains pending below, Jones was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court – to appeal the denial of his motions to dismiss and to stay. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989); Pace Constr. Corp. v. Northpark Assocs., 215 Ga. App. 438, 439 (450 SE2d 828) (1994) (denial of motion to dismiss is interlocutory); see also Grange Mut. Casualty Co. v. Riverdale Apartments, L. P., 218 Ga. App. 685, 687 (463 SE2d 46) (1995) (denial of motion to stay is interlocutory). Here, it appears that Jones attempted to obtain a certificate of immediate review, but the trial court declined to enter the certificate. “The denial of a certificate for interlocutory appeal is not reviewable.” Price v. State, 237 Ga. 352, 352 (2) (227 SE2d 368) (1976). Absent a timely certificate of immediate review, the party seeking to appeal must wait until the final judgment to do so. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175, 176 (200 SE2d 748) (1973). Jones’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/08/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Titus Jones v. Roselle Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/titus-jones-v-roselle-jones-gactapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack