Tillman v. State

600 So. 2d 37, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6642, 1992 WL 123440
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 1992·No. No. 91-2796·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s conviction of resisting an officer without violence is hereby reversed and remanded for a new trial. “[T]he trial court erred in instructing the jury as a matter of law that the police officer was acting lawfully when he arrested” the defendant where the legality of the officer’s actions was an issue to be determined by the jury. Dion v. State, 564 So.2d 618, 618 (Fla. 4th DCA1990); Kirschenbaum v. State, 592 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA1992); see Brannen v. State, 453 [38]*38So.2d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA1984); Smith v. State, 399 So.2d 70 (Fla. 5th DCA1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tillman v. State, 600 So. 2d 37, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6642, 1992 WL 123440 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

600 So. 2d 37 (Tillman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hierro v. State
608 So. 2d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)