Kirschenbaum v. State
This text of 592 So. 2d 1272 (Kirschenbaum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert KIRSCHENBAUM, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Giselle Lylen and Angelica D. Zayas, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant's conviction of resisting an officer with violence is reversed for a new trial because the trial court
erred in instructing the jury as a matter of law that the police officer was acting lawfully when he arrested appellant. See Brannen v. State, 453 So.2d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Smith v. State, 399 So.2d 70 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
Dion v. State, 564 So.2d 618, 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
592 So. 2d 1272, 1992 WL 21866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirschenbaum-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.