Tillman v. State

577 So. 2d 1003, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3621, 1991 WL 61782
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tillman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 So. 2d 767
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1991·No. No. 89-2622·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Tillman appeals a judgment and sentence adjudicating him guilty of sale of a substance in lieu of a controlled substance in violation of section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1987), possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell in violation of section 893.13(l)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), and sale of a controlled substance in violation of section 893.13(l)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988).

The Supreme Court of Florida recently held, in answer to a certified question, that a double jeopardy violation does not occur upon conviction for the crimes of sale and possession (or possession with intent to sell) of the same quantum of contraband, when the crimes occurred after the effective date of section 775.021, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988). State v. V.A.A., 577 So.2d 941 (Fla.1991). Because the offenses in this ease were committed after October 1, 1988, the effective date of the statute, appellant’s convictions and sentences for sale and possession with intent to sell are affirmed.1

The judgments and sentences appealed are therefore AFFIRMED.

SMITH,. NIMMONS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tillman v. State, 577 So. 2d 1003, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3621, 1991 WL 61782 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

577 So. 2d 1003 (Tillman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. V.A.A.
577 So. 2d 941 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)