Tiffer v. Workers Compensation
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1814
ROMAN TIFFER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WORKERS COMPENSATION; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION; ABACUS CORPORATION; THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-01550-WDQ)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roman Tiffer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Roman Tiffer appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Tiffer v. Workers Comp., No. 1:09-cv-
01550-WDQ (D. Md. June 19, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tiffer v. Workers Compensation (Tiffer v. Workers Compensation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.