Tiffer v. Workers Compensation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2009·No. 09-1814·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1814

ROMAN TIFFER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WORKERS COMPENSATION; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION; ABACUS CORPORATION; THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-01550-WDQ)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roman Tiffer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roman Tiffer appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Tiffer v. Workers Comp., No. 1:09-cv-

01550-WDQ (D. Md. June 19, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tiffer v. Workers Compensation, (4th Cir. 2009).

Tiffer v. Workers Compensation (Tiffer v. Workers Compensation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.