Tiffer v. Workers Compensation

Fourth Circuit

Tiffer v. Workers Compensation

332 F. App'x 108

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2009·No. No. 09-1814·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roman Tiffer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tiffer v. Workers Comp., No. 1:09-cv-01550-WDQ (D.Md. June 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roman Tiffer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tiffer v. Workers Comp., No. 1:09-cv-01550-WDQ (D.Md. June 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Tiffer v. Workers Compensation, 332 F. App'x 108 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 108 (Tiffer v. Workers Compensation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.