Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1852

ROMAN TIFFER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WORKER=S COMPENSATION; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION; ABACUS CORPORATION; THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:08- cv-01417-JFM)

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 24, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roman Tiffer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roman Tiffer appeals the district court=s order dismissing

without prejudice his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '

1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). In his informal appellate brief, Tiffer does

not address the district court=s ruling that he failed to allege

facts setting forth a claim cognizable in federal court. *

Therefore, Tiffer has waived appellate review of that issue. See

4th Cir. R. 34(b) (AThe Court will limit its review to the issues

raised in the informal brief.@). Accordingly, we affirm the

district court=s order. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We have jurisdiction to consider this appeal because the order of dismissal suggests that no amendment to the complaint could cure the defects in Tiffer=s case. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993).