Thompson v. Limke
This text of Thompson v. Limke (Thompson v. Limke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk
CLINTON K. THOMPSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 96-6231 v. (D.C. No. 95-CV-1718) (Western District of Oklahoma) TED LIMKE; EDWIN KIMMEL,
Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Before PORFILIO, ANDERSON, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this
appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered
submitted without oral argument.
After consideration of the briefs and the record, we conclude the district court did
not err in its judgment. We therefore AFFIRM substantially for the reasons given by the
district court.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thompson v. Limke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-limke-ca10-1997.