Thomas v. United States
824 A.2d 26, 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 290, 2003 WL 21198042
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 22, 2003
Docket00-CF-344
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 824 A.2d 26 (Thomas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. United States, 824 A.2d 26, 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 290, 2003 WL 21198042 (D.C. 2003).
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in Judge Schwelb’s lead concurring opinion, except with respect to the issue discussed in Judge Farrell’s concurring opinion and in Part I of Judge Ruiz’ dissenting opinion. As to that issue, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in Judge Farrell’s opinion and in footnote 13 to Judge Schwelb’s opinion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hobbs v. United States
18 A.3d 796 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
Scott v. United States
953 A.2d 1082 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
Hinton v. United States
951 A.2d 773 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
Williams v. United States
858 A.2d 984 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
Whitney v. State
857 A.2d 625 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2004)
Watkins v. United States
846 A.2d 293 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
Thomas v. United States
824 A.2d 26 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
824 A.2d 26, 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 290, 2003 WL 21198042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-united-states-dc-2003.