Thomas v. Stewart
132 N.Y. 580
Opinion
[588] Vann, J., reads for reversal, unless a stipulation for a reduction of the recovery is made, and for a modification if stipulation is made, as specified in the opinion.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. Stewart, 132 N.Y. 580 (N.Y. 1892).
132 N.Y. 580 (Thomas v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gabriel v. Corkum
196 P.2d 437 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1948)
Theatre Realty Co. v. Aronberg-Fried Co.
85 F.2d 383 (Eighth Circuit, 1936)
Reaugh Construction Co. v. Corlett
23 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 336 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1920)
Albright v. Trinity Presbyterian Church
160 N.Y.S. 598 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)
People Ex Rel. Rapid Transit Subway Construction Co. v. Craven
104 N.E. 922 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)
People ex rel. R. T. Ford Co. v. Lewis
159 A.D. 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Smith v. State
65 Misc. 376 (New York Supreme Court, 1909)
Langley v. . Rouss
77 N.E. 1168 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Hebert v. Dewey
77 N.E. 822 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Keeler v. Bell
48 Misc. 427 (New York Supreme Court, 1905)
Price v. City of New York
104 A.D. 198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Langley v. Rouss
85 A.D. 27 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Nussberger v. Wasserman
40 Misc. 120 (New York Supreme Court, 1903)
White v. Livingston
69 A.D. 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Schnaier v. Nathan
49 A.D. 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New York
54 N.E. 661 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Duell v. McCraw
33 N.Y.S. 528 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Schillinger Fire-Proof Cement & Asphalt Co. v. Arnott
33 N.Y.S. 343 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Andrews
23 N.Y.S. 998 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)