Thomas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Thomas v. State

170 Tex. Crim. 448

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 18, 1961

DocketNo. 32,824

StatusPublished

This text of 170 Tex. Crim. 448 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 448 (Tex. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is a writ of error to review the final judgment in a bond forfeiture.

The record sustains appellants’ contention that there was no service of citation upon either of them, for which reason the default judgment making final the forfeiture of the appearance bond upon which they are sureties is without support.

The state agrees and does not seek affirmance.

The judgment making the judgment nisi final is reserved and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is a writ of error to review the final judgment in a bond forfeiture.

The record sustains appellants’ contention that there was no service of citation upon either of them, for which reason the default judgment making final the forfeiture of the appearance bond upon which they are sureties is without support.

The state agrees and does not seek affirmance.

The judgment making the judgment nisi final is reserved and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 Tex. Crim. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-texcrimapp-1961.