Thomas v. State

332 S.W.2d 334, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3083

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 Tex. Crim. 331 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 24, 1960·No. No. 31528·Published

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of heroin; the punishment, 22 years.

Trial was before a jury upon a plea of guilty. Appellant testified that he pleaded guilty because he was guilty of having possession of heroin which he acquired in Paris, France, and was ready to serve whatever sentence the jury might see fit as proper and fair punishment for him.

[335]*335The State’s evidence showed that a city-detective arrested appellant in Dallas and took from him two ounces of heroin.

No brief has been filed in appellant’s behalf and we find no error which, under the record, would authorize reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of heroin; the punishment, 22 years.

[335]*335The State’s evidence showed that a city-detective arrested appellant in Dallas and took from him two ounces of heroin.

No brief has been filed in appellant’s behalf and we find no error which, under the record, would authorize reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Thomas v. State, 332 S.W.2d 334, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3083 (Tex. 1960).

Pincite

332 S.W.2d 334 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.