Thomas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thomas v. State

415 S.W.3d 137, 2013 WL 6199558, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1415

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 359 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 2013·No. No. ED 99544·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Thomas (Movant) appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 24.035 (2013) without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Thomas (Movant) appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 24.035 (2013) without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).

Thomas v. State, 415 S.W.3d 137, 2013 WL 6199558, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

415 S.W.3d 137 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.