Thomas v. State

359 S.W.3d 582, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 239, 2012 WL 713341
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2012·No. ED 96503·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antwan L. Thomas appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 359 S.W.3d 582, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 239, 2012 WL 713341 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

359 S.W.3d 582 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Meza
359 S.W.3d 582 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)