Thomas v. State

463 S.W.3d 463, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2015 WL 3609303
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 539
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 2015·No. No. ED 101603·Published

Opinion

[464]*464 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■ John Thomas appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 463 S.W.3d 463, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2015 WL 3609303 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

463 S.W.3d 463 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
242 S.W.3d 705 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2008)