Thomas v. State
133 So. 3d 556, 2014 WL 464067, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1394
This text of 133 So. 3d 556 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. State, 133 So. 3d 556, 2014 WL 464067, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1394 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
Opinion
The order striking Joseph Lee Thomas’s motion to compel the return of property is affirmed without prejudice for Thomas to file an authorized motion. Should Thomas choose to file such a motion, the circuit court shall entertain Thomas’s motion pursuant to the procedure outlined in Bolden v. State, 875 So.2d 780, 782-83 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Affirmed without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bolden v. State
875 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 So. 3d 556, 2014 WL 464067, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.