Raymond M. Austin v. State of Florida

181 So. 3d 1187, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 4, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 66, 2016 WL 164158
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 14, 2016·No. SC14-2215·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Austin v. State, 158 So.3d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), based on express and direct conflict with the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Lightsey v. State, 112 So.3d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond M. Austin v. State of Florida, 181 So. 3d 1187, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 4, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 66, 2016 WL 164158 (Fla. 2016).

181 So. 3d 1187 (Raymond M. Austin v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torres v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016