Santiago v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 2015
Docket12-2948 & 12-2850
StatusPublished

This text of Santiago v. State (Santiago v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santiago v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 11, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D12-2948; 3D12-2850 Lower Tribunal No. 06-5240 ________________

Benito Santiago, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ellen Venzer, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and James Moody, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed as to both the appeal and cross-appeal. Regarding the State’s

challenge to two consecutive sentences of thirty years (with a twenty-five year

minimum mandatory term for each), see Thomas v. State, 135 So. 3d 590 (Fla. 1st

DCA 2014) (affirming a juvenile offender’s forty year sentence for first-degree

murder imposed after remand following Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455

(2012)). But see Horsley v. State, 121 So. 3d 1130, 1131 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013),

review granted, Nos. SC13-1937, SC13-2000, 2013 WL 6224657 (Fla. Nov. 14,

2013) (“[T]he only sentence now available in Florida for a charge of capital

murder committed by a juvenile is life with the possibility of parole after twenty-

five years.”).1

1 Horsley, 2013 WL 6224657 (Oral argument held Nov. 6, 2014), is presently pending review before the Florida Supreme Court, and may provide further guidance regarding the sentencing options available after Miller, 132 S. Ct. 2455. In the interim, however, we affirm based on Thomas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Horsley v. State
121 So. 3d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Thomas v. State
135 So. 3d 590 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Santiago v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.