Thodberg v. State

194 S.W. 1108, 81 Tex. Crim. 225, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 106
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 11, 1917
DocketNo. 4430.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 194 S.W. 1108 (Thodberg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thodberg v. State, 194 S.W. 1108, 81 Tex. Crim. 225, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 106 (Tex. 1917).

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from a forfeited bail bond under scire facias proceedings. Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney General to dismiss the appeal because brief in the case was not filed in the court below. Hnder the recent case of Rudy v. State, 80 Texas Crim. Rep., 568, 191 S. W. Rep., 698, and authorities there cited, the motion is well taken. The appeal will be dismissed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Dismissed.

PBENDEBGAST, Judge, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ivy v. State
61 S.W.2d 998 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Wimberly v. State
271 S.W. 608 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
White v. State
276 S.W. 274 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 S.W. 1108, 81 Tex. Crim. 225, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thodberg-v-state-texcrimapp-1917.