Rudy v. State

191 S.W.2d 698, 191 S.W. 698, 80 Tex. Crim. 568, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 395
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 27, 1916·No. No. 4316.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by appellant Budy and his two sureties from a judgment against all of them on his forfeited bail bond.

The statute (art. 497, C. C. P.) expressly provides that after the judgment nisi is rendered, the cause shall be docketed upon the civil docket in the name of the State as plaintiff, and the principal and sureties as defendants; “and the proceedings had therein shall be governed by the same rules governing other civil actions.”

The record shows that no briefs were filed in the court below at all and none in this until just the day before the case was submitted. The Assistant Attorney General’s motion, therefore, to dismiss the appeal on this ground must he granted, as has all the time and many times been held by this court. See Heiman v. State, 70 Texas Crim. Rep., 480, 158 S. W. Rep., 276; Thetford v. State, 74 Texas Crim. Rep., 649, 169 S. W. Rep., 1153. Other cases are cited in both of these. The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rudy v. State, 191 S.W.2d 698, 191 S.W. 698, 80 Tex. Crim. 568, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 395 (Tex. 1916).

191 S.W.2d 698 (Rudy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
272 S.W. 462 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Wimberly v. State
271 S.W. 608 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
White v. State
276 S.W. 274 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Thodberg v. State
194 S.W. 1108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)