Mattie Jay v. State
29 S.W. 472, 34 Tex. Crim. 98, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21
Opinion
This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment on a forfeited bail bond. It is filed here without briefs, and motion is made by the Assistant-Attorney-General to dismiss this appeal, because of the failure of the appellants to file their brief in this court, and in not complying with the Rules in filing copy in the lower court. This character of case is governed by the same rules on appeal as civil causes by express statutory enactment.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Judges all present and concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mattie Jay v. State, 29 S.W. 472, 34 Tex. Crim. 98, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21 (Tex. 1895).
29 S.W. 472 (Mattie Jay v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
226 S.W. 409 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Rudy v. State
191 S.W.2d 698 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Mendlovitz v. State
189 S.W.2d 262 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
General Bonding & Casualty Ins. v. State
165 S.W. 615 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Heiman v. State
158 S.W. 276 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)