Mattie Jay v. State

29 S.W. 472, 34 Tex. Crim. 98, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 30, 1895
DocketNo. 538.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 29 S.W. 472 (Mattie Jay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mattie Jay v. State, 29 S.W. 472, 34 Tex. Crim. 98, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21 (Tex. 1895).

Opinion

HURT, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment on a forfeited bail bond. It is filed here without briefs, and motion is made by the Assistant-Attorney-General to dismiss this appeal, because of the failure of the appellants to file their brief in this court, and in not complying with the Rules in filing copy in the lower court. This character of case is governed by the same rules on appeal as civil causes by express statutory enactment.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
226 S.W. 409 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Rudy v. State
191 S.W.2d 698 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Mendlovitz v. State
189 S.W.2d 262 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
General Bonding & Casualty Ins. v. State
165 S.W. 615 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Heiman v. State
158 S.W. 276 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.W. 472, 34 Tex. Crim. 98, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattie-jay-v-state-texcrimapp-1895.