Ivy v. State
This text of 61 S.W.2d 998 (Ivy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a final judgment upon forfeiture of a bail bond.
The record fails to show that any briefs were filed by appellants in the trial court. We fail to find a waiver by the state of such filing. The motion is made by the state’s attorney before this court to dismiss the appeal because briefs in the case were not filed in the court below. It is the uniform holding of.' [191]*191this court in cases such as this briefs must be filed in the trial court and in this court in compliance with the law and rules governing civil cases, or a waiver of such filing must appear of record. Article 2283, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925; article 866, C. C. P.; Lewis et al. v. State, 109 Texas Crim. Rep., 661, 7 S. W. (2d) 74; Bratton et al. v. State, 109 Texas Crim. Rep., 329,. 4 S. W. (2d) 562; Rees et al. v. State (Tex. Crim. App.), 13 S. W. (2d) 858; Johns et al. v. State, 115 Texas Crim. Rep., 335, 29 S. W. (2d) 757; Thodberg et al v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 225, 194 S. W., 1108; Morton et al. v. State, 59 S. W. (2d) 830.
The motion to dismiss is well taken. The appeal will be dismissed, and it is accordingly so ordered.
Dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 S.W.2d 998, 124 Tex. Crim. 190, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivy-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.