Johns, Shipman and Heydrick v. State
This text of 29 S.W.2d 757 (Johns, Shipman and Heydrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is an appeal from a final judgment upon forfeiture of a bail bond.
The record fails to show that any briefs were filed by appellants in the trial court. We fail to find a waiver by the state of such filing. It is the uniform holding of this court that in cases such as *336 this briefs must be filed in the trial court and in this court in compliance with the law and rules governing civil cases, or a waiver of such filing must appear of record. Art. 2283, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925; Art. 856, C. C. P.; Lewis et al. v. State, 109 Tex. Cr..R. 661, 7 S. W. (2d) 74; Bratton et al. v. State, 109 Tex. Cr. R. 329, 4 S. W. (2d) 562; Rees et al. v. State, 13 S. W. (2d) 856.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 S.W.2d 757, 115 Tex. Crim. 335, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johns-shipman-and-heydrick-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.