Thibodeaux v. Diamond M Drilling Co.

632 So. 2d 736, 1994 La. LEXIS 507, 1994 WL 63563
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 25, 1994
Docket93-C-2963
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 632 So. 2d 736 (Thibodeaux v. Diamond M Drilling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thibodeaux v. Diamond M Drilling Co., 632 So. 2d 736, 1994 La. LEXIS 507, 1994 WL 63563 (La. 1994).

Opinion

632 So.2d 736 (1994)

Floyd THIBODEAUX
v.
DIAMOND M DRILLING COMPANY.

No. 93-C-2963.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 1994.

PER CURIAM.

We granted this application to consider whether La.R.S. 23:1223(B) should be applied retroactively to award a credit to an employer for the temporary total benefits received by an injured employee prior to his award of supplemental earnings benefits. At the time of plaintiff's injury in 1984, LSA R.S. 23:1223 read as follows:

When compensation has been paid under R.S. 23:1221(1), (2) or (3), the amount of such payment shall be deducted from any compensation allowed under R.S. 23:1221(4) or Subpart C of this Part.

This section did not provide a credit against an award of supplemental earnings benefits until it was amended effective January 1, 1990.[1] Because the amendment established a new credit for the employer, thereby divested the employee of compensation, we find that the amendment constituted a substantive change in the law. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith, 609 So.2d 809, 817 (La.1992). Accordingly, retroactive application of this amendment is impermissible and the employer has no right to a reduction of benefits because no such reduction was authorized at the time of plaintiff's injury.

Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed insofar as the court allowed a credit against the award of supplemental earnings benefits for the temporary total benefits received by the plaintiff. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

NOTES

[1] The amendment added section B to the statute, which provides:

When compensation has been paid under R.S. 23:1221(1), (2), or (4), the amount of such payment shall be deducted from any compensation allowed under R.S. 23:1221(3) or Subpart C of this Part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frith v. Riverwood, Inc.
892 So. 2d 7 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2005)
Rodriguez v. City of New Orleans
883 So. 2d 1 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc.
878 So. 2d 595 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)
Gardache v. City of New Orleans
874 So. 2d 247 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)
Benjamin v. Asplundh Tree Co.
861 So. 2d 835 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)
Burge v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n
819 So. 2d 1098 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)
Town of Basile v. Clark
769 So. 2d 591 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
Fallen v. New Orleans Police Dept.
697 So. 2d 1077 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)
Mason v. Auto Convoy
662 So. 2d 843 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)
Crabtree v. State Farm Ins. Co.
632 So. 2d 736 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 So. 2d 736, 1994 La. LEXIS 507, 1994 WL 63563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thibodeaux-v-diamond-m-drilling-co-la-1994.