The Palmyra

23 U.S. 502, 6 L. Ed. 376, 10 Wheat. 502, 1825 U.S. LEXIS 243
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 19, 1825
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 23 U.S. 502 (The Palmyra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Palmyra, 23 U.S. 502, 6 L. Ed. 376, 10 Wheat. 502, 1825 U.S. LEXIS 243 (1825).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Marshal,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Court has had the question submitted in this cause under, consideration, and -is of opinion, that the appeal is not well taken. The decree of the Circuit Court, was not final in the sense of the act of Congress. The damages remain undisposed of and aitappeal may still lie *504 upon that part of the decree awarding damages. The whole cause is not, therefore, finally determined in the Circuit Court ; and we are of opinion that the cause cannot be divided, so as to bring up successively distinct parts of it.

The case in 3 Cranch, 179. is essentially different. In that case, which was an. appeal in an equity cause, there was a decree of foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged property. The sale could, only be ordered after an account taken, or the sum due on the mortgage ascertained in some other way; and the usual decree is, that unless the defendant shall pay that sum in a given time, the estate shall be sold. The decree of sale therefore is, in such a case, final upon the rights of the parties in controversy, and leaves, ministerial duties only to be performed.

Appeal dismissed. a

a

See Young v. Grundy, 6 Cranch, 51. Gibbons v. Ogden, 6 Wheat. Rep. 448.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Iordanis Anastasiadis v. S.S. Little John
339 F.2d 538 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
George v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.
293 U.S. 377 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.
90 F. 211 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina, 1898)
McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.
146 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Grant v. East & West R.
50 F. 795 (Fifth Circuit, 1892)
Williams v. Delano
28 N.E. 1122 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. Martin
132 U.S. 91 (Supreme Court, 1889)
The Farmers'loan and Trust Co.
129 U.S. 206 (Supreme Court, 1889)
McLean v. Clark
23 F. 861 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1885)
Cohn v. Hamlet
44 Ark. 344 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 U.S. 502, 6 L. Ed. 376, 10 Wheat. 502, 1825 U.S. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-palmyra-scotus-1825.