Ray v. Law

7 U.S. 179, 2 L. Ed. 404, 3 Cranch 179, 1805 U.S. LEXIS 250
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 18, 1805·Published·Cited by 46 cases

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.

We can do nothing, without seeing the record, and the papers offered cannot be considered by us as a record. „ _ *The court, however, is of opinion, that a decree for a sale under a -* mortgage, is such a final decree as may be appealed from. We suppose, that when the court below understands that to be our opinion, it will .allow an appeal, if it be a case to which this opinion applies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Law, 7 U.S. 179, 2 L. Ed. 404, 3 Cranch 179, 1805 U.S. LEXIS 250 (1805).

7 U.S. 179 (Ray v. Law) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HSBC Bank USA v. Kirkland Townsend
793 F.3d 771 (Seventh Circuit, 2015)
Shuput v. Lauer
325 N.W.2d 321 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1982)
Citibank, N. A. v. Data Lease Financial Corporation
645 F.2d 333 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States
370 U.S. 294 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Grieve v. Huber
283 P. 1105 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1930)
Rector v. United States
20 F.2d 845 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)
Wells v. Shriver
1921 OK 122 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Lynham v. Hufty
44 App. D.C. 589 (D.C. Circuit, 1915)
La Bourgogne
210 U.S. 95 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Chase v. Driver
92 F. 780 (Eighth Circuit, 1899)
Central Trust Co. of New York v. Western N. C. R. Co.
89 F. 24 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina, 1898)
Desvergers v. Parsons
60 F. 143 (Fifth Circuit, 1894)
McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.
146 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1892)